[Draft - Tentative] - Multi-step process provisions#701
Draft
giacomo-petri wants to merge 25 commits into
Draft
Conversation
…o multi-step-process-identification-conveys-structure-or-count.md
✅ Deploy Preview for wcag3 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a tentative PR intended to help users preview and review the final outcome of all provisions related to multi-step processes.
I believe these provisions should be reviewed as a group, since each serves a distinct purpose and contributes to the overall effectiveness and clarity of the multi-step process indication.
For those who prefer reviewing the content in google docs, the links are provided below:
If you'd like additional context on why "All steps listed" was moved to an assertion and why new provisions were introduced, you can refer to the analysis in the Subgroup document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JiMY1pndzETXhsHlEG2vJhrbr9ko-6mWUg5VqmEXMFg/edit?tab=t.wq559ysef8sh
If you're also interested, you can review the test cases we use to validate, refine, and update these provisions in this spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ocaYPOWKbA-KArlIx05dduqtaNXK9J_5zozycMkH9bE/edit?gid=318215303#gid=318215303